The drawbacks of conventional compliance management are expressed through various means:
- Administrative Burden: Monitoring compliance obligations across diverse regulations, roles, and geographies generates a high administrative burden.
- Limited Visibility: Companies lack end-to-end views of compliance status, which results in blind spots and inherent risks.
- Reactive Approach: Traditional systems typically identify compliance issues after they become problems rather than preventing them proactively.
- Completion vs. Comprehension: Most compliance tracking focuses on course completion rather than actual understanding and application of compliance knowledge.
- Difficulty Demonstrating Due Diligence: When issues arise, organizations often struggle to provide evidence of reasonable compliance efforts.
The drawbacks of conventional compliance management are expressed through various means:
- Administrative Burden: Monitoring compliance obligations across diverse regulations, roles, and geographies generates a high administrative burden.
- Limited Visibility: Companies lack end-to-end views of compliance status, which results in blind spots and inherent risks.
- Reactive Approach: Traditional systems typically identify compliance issues after they become problems rather than preventing them proactively.
- Completion vs. Comprehension: Most compliance tracking focuses on course completion rather than actual understanding and application of compliance knowledge.
- Difficulty Demonstrating Due Diligence: When issues arise, organizations often struggle to provide evidence of reasonable compliance efforts.