Organizations of all industries struggle with correctly identifying what skill gaps truly have an impact on business performance. This inability comes in many forms:
- Lack of Comprehensive Data: Most organizations have fragmented skill data scattered across various systems-HRIS, LMS, performance management, and project management tools. This fragmentation makes it hard to produce a complete picture of organizational capabilities.
- Manual, Time-Consuming Processes: Conventional skill gap analysis tends to use extensive surveys, manager ratings, and manual compilation of data. It may take weeks or months to complete this process, during which time the information could already be outdated.
- Difficulty Prioritizing Gaps: Even if skill gaps are determined, organizations have trouble identifying which ones are most likely to have an impact on the business. Without prioritization, learning investments can get misplaced in the wrong areas.
- Limited Connection to Business Outcomes: Few skill gap analyses tie the gaps identified to measures of business performance in such a way that it is difficult to make a case for targeted development investments.
- Inability to Forecast Future Needs: Traditional approaches are backward-looking, concentrating on existing gaps as at the moment, rather than looking forward and forecasting future skills requirements about market trends and strategic frameworks.
Organizations of all industries struggle with correctly identifying what skill gaps truly have an impact on business performance. This inability comes in many forms:
- Lack of Comprehensive Data: Most organizations have fragmented skill data scattered across various systems-HRIS, LMS, performance management, and project management tools. This fragmentation makes it hard to produce a complete picture of organizational capabilities.
- Manual, Time-Consuming Processes: Conventional skill gap analysis tends to use extensive surveys, manager ratings, and manual compilation of data. It may take weeks or months to complete this process, during which time the information could already be outdated.
- Difficulty Prioritizing Gaps: Even if skill gaps are determined, organizations have trouble identifying which ones are most likely to have an impact on the business. Without prioritization, learning investments can get misplaced in the wrong areas.
- Limited Connection to Business Outcomes: Few skill gap analyses tie the gaps identified to measures of business performance in such a way that it is difficult to make a case for targeted development investments.
- Inability to Forecast Future Needs: Traditional approaches are backward-looking, concentrating on existing gaps as at the moment, rather than looking forward and forecasting future skills requirements about market trends and strategic frameworks.