The limitations of traditional succession planning manifest in several ways:
- Subjective Candidate Identification: Succession candidates are usually chosen from what is visible and known rather than from measured capabilities and potential.
- Limited Succession Pools: Companies tend to identify too few candidates for key positions, leaving a huge risk if they leave or are not available.
- Disconnection from Development: Succession plans frequently exist as static documents without clear connections to development activities and readiness tracking.
- Narrow Focus on Leadership: Most succession programs concentrate solely on executive positions, omitting essential technical and specialized roles that are high-risk for the business.
- Infrequent Updates: Succession plans are reviewed annually at most, without regard for evolving business needs and development of candidates.
The limitations of traditional succession planning manifest in several ways:
- Subjective Candidate Identification: Succession candidates are usually chosen from what is visible and known rather than from measured capabilities and potential.
- Limited Succession Pools: Companies tend to identify too few candidates for key positions, leaving a huge risk if they leave or are not available.
- Disconnection from Development: Succession plans frequently exist as static documents without clear connections to development activities and readiness tracking.
- Narrow Focus on Leadership: Most succession programs concentrate solely on executive positions, omitting essential technical and specialized roles that are high-risk for the business.
- Infrequent Updates: Succession plans are reviewed annually at most, without regard for evolving business needs and development of candidates.